Picard, R. W., Fedor, S., & Ayzenberg, Y. (2016). Response to Commentaries on “Multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry”. Emotion Review, 8(1), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565523
Work for a Member company and need a Member Portal account? Register here with your company email address.
Picard, R. W., Fedor, S., & Ayzenberg, Y. (2016). Response to Commentaries on “Multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry”. Emotion Review, 8(1), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565523
We respond to the commentaries of Critchley & Nagai, Mendes, Norman, Sabatinelli, and Richter. We agree that a theory needs to make predictions and we elaborate on the predictions we made so far. We do not agree that arousal has to have a precise definition in order to present theory about it; however, we do provide concrete answers to questions raised about Multiple Arousal Theory.